18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Gripmax Stature H/T vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Gripmax Stature H/T /0%	Continental SportContact 5 SUV /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R23	R16 - R23	R18 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Premium

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Number of sizes available

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 93

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 69

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

Number of tests

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 3x

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Best position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Worst position in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2.

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Average position in tests

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 1.33

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Year of the last test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 2020

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Best rating in test

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Worst rating in test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

87%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

46%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 91%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 75%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 98%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 23%

Wet handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 82%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 66%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV A

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

86%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Gripmax
Stature H/T

99%

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

64%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

2. Continental SportContact 5 SUV ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

100%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

86%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 100%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

3. Gripmax Stature H/T 73%

Dry handling

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV 99%

2. Gripmax Stature H/T 98%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
SportContact 5 SUV

96%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Gripmax
Stature H/T

79%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV C

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

3. Gripmax Stature H/T ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Gripmax Stature H/T vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands