Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. General Altimax One S Lowcost
Comparison: General Altimax One S vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Pakistan (General) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). General is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than General (36%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 23% of the General Altimax One S. The first tyre test of General Altimax One S was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Altimax One S and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | General Altimax One S
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. General Altimax One S 32.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| General Altimax One S Rating: Good | 2,4 | 3,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| General Altimax One S | 39,3 | 32,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
