Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost3. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Short summary: The Fulda SportControl 2 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 are closely matched summer tyres that score the same on our site (63%). Neither model has a published direct replacement at the moment. For manufacturer info see Fulda’s brand page (Fulda) and Sava’s manufacturer page (Sava).
How they performed across tests
- Autobild (52 tyres): Fulda finished 9th, Sava 11th. Autobild highlighted Fulda’s low exterior noise, comfort and rolling resistance, while Sava was praised for aquaplaning resistance and price/value. Edge: Fulda.
- ADAC 2020: Both tyres show very similar strengths. Fulda’s positives: good aquaplaning reserves, short wet and dry braking, and a good price/performance ratio; negatives: delayed steering response and only moderate treadwear. Sava’s positives: very good aquaplaning safety, stable dry behaviour, short braking distances, good comfort and low price; negative: limited tread life. Edge: slight advantage to Sava for overall balance and dry stability.
- ACE (9 tyres): Sava placed 2nd and Fulda 3rd. Both scored strongly for wet handling and dry handling, with Sava marginally ahead in objective wet metrics. Edge: Sava.
Summarised strengths
- Fulda SportControl 2 — excels at comfort, low exterior noise and displays good results in aquaplaning and rolling resistance. It achieves slightly higher placement in the large Autobild field, which points to consistent all-round performance at its price point.
- Sava Intensa UHP 2 — stands out for wet and dry braking, strong aquaplaning reserves, stable dry handling and comfort. ACE and ADAC results show it as one of the better performers in objective wet tests and value-conscious UHP buyers will appreciate the price/performance balance.
Common weaknesses
- Both tyres are noted for limited tread life / moderate mileage by ADAC. If longevity is a primary concern, neither is class-leading.
- Fulda has an additional downside of delayed steering response in ADAC’s evaluation, which may affect driver confidence at the limit.
Verdict — which to choose?
If you prioritize wet-weather safety, direct handling and comfort, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 holds a slight overall edge thanks to strong ACE and ADAC showings and top wet-handling scores. If you value quieter ride, slightly better rolling resistance and a marginally higher position in larger comparative tests, the Fulda SportControl 2 is a very competitive alternative. Both represent good value in the summer tyre segment, but expect similar trade-offs on tyre wear.
Bottom line: performance and price make both tyres attractive; Sava nudges ahead in objective wet/dry test rankings, while Fulda offers a quieter, slightly more economical ride. Consider Sava for sharper handling and wet confidence, Fulda for comfort and low noise.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.692. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 12 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
12
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35.5 | 29.9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.2 | 30.2 | |||||
| Imperial EcoSport 2 | 38.6 | 33 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Imperial EcoSport 2 | 72.3 | 31.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Recommended | 61 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,1 | 37,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
