Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| Imperial EcoSport 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
On paper and in independent testing the two summer tyres deliver very different results. The Fulda SportControl 2 emerges as the stronger performer overall, while the Imperial EcoSport 2 occupies a much lower position in the same test series. Neither model in the dataset shows a recorded successor — no replacement model is listed.
Fulda SportControl 2 — summary of test results and characteristics
Our aggregated score for the Fulda SportControl 2 is 69%. In the Autobild comparison (53 tyres) it finished in 12th place, a clear upper‑midfield result. Test highlights reported by Autobild include excellent exterior noise and comfort, low rolling resistance and very good cross aquaplaning reserves. The Autobild 2021 summary specifically praises its short braking distances on wet and dry surfaces and calls the tyre a good value for money.
- Strengths: quiet and comfortable ride; good wet braking; strong aquaplaning resistance; competitive rolling resistance (fuel efficiency).
- Weaknesses: delayed steering response (less direct steering feel); average wear performance compared with top competitors.
Overall the SportControl 2 is positioned as a safe and comfortable choice for everyday summer driving, with particular advantages in wet safety and noise/comfort balance — good for drivers prioritising refinement and predictable wet behaviour.
Imperial EcoSport 2 — summary of test results and characteristics
The Imperial EcoSport 2 fared significantly worse in the same Autobild comparison, placing 41st out of 53. Our compiled rating shows 0% for this tyre in the dataset, which indicates it scored poorly across measured categories or was effectively uncompetitive in the recorded tests. Autobild did not list specific strengths for the EcoSport 2 in the provided data.
- Strengths: none highlighted in the available test summary.
- Weaknesses: low overall position in comparative tests; lack of notable performance advantages; likely compromises in wet braking, noise, comfort or wear compared with mid‑range options.
Given the low ranking and lack of standout attributes in the provided results, the Imperial EcoSport 2 appears suited only where cost is the overriding factor and test performance is of secondary importance.
Head‑to‑head verdict
Comparing positions and scores, the Fulda SportControl 2 clearly outperforms the Imperial EcoSport 2 across the available tests. Fulda’s advantages in wet braking, aquaplaning resistance, noise and comfort make it the better overall choice for typical summer driving conditions. The Imperial finished far lower in the same test group and showed no documented test strengths in the supplied data.
For brand and product pages see the manufacturer links: Fulda (manufacturer) and Imperial (manufacturer).
Recommendation: choose the Fulda SportControl 2 if you value wet performance, comfort and lower rolling resistance. The Imperial EcoSport 2 does not match those test results and should be selected only with clear awareness of its comparatively weak showing in independent tests.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.69
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35.5 | 29.9 | |||||
| Imperial EcoSport 2 | 38.6 | 33 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Imperial EcoSport 2 | 72.3 | 31.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,1 | 37,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
