Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Debica (56%). In this particular case, the Fulda SportControl 2 has a better rating of 63% compared to 51% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Fulda SportControl 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2024 when was the Debica Presto UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SportControl 2 and the Presto UHP 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Fulda SportControl 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Debica Presto UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| Debica Presto UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.69
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||