Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Fulda (68%). The first tyre test of Fulda SportControl 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the SportControl 2 and the Turanza T001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Fulda SportControl 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B rating.
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.69
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||