Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle3. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Nokian WeatherProof
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.333. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory3. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
