Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Fulda (4%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 69% compared to 4% of the Fulda MultiControl. The first tyre test of Fulda MultiControl was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Fulda MultiControl has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.
| # | Fulda MultiControl
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
