Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

When it comes to all-round tyres, those who value quality performance in all weather conditions may find themselves considering the Fulda MultiControl and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. However, the comparison of these two tyres from prominent manufacturers — Fulda and Hankook — reveals some differences which might help you make the right choice.

Taking a close look at these models, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a successor to the Hankook Kinergy 4S, offering stellar performance and solid reliability. Despite minor drawbacks such as slightly extended wet and dry braking distances, the tyre has received a commendable 89% rating from us. According to several AutoBild tests from 2020-2023, its strengths lie in its outstanding performance on snowy surfaces, comfortable ride, and good mileage.

Fulda MultiControl, on the other hand, did not have a predecessor or a replacement tyre. Though our rating for this tyre is still pending, it still managed to hold its ground in comparison. It has shown strengths in snow braking, snow traction and dry handling as affirmed in the ACE test. However, it ranked lower in the AutoBild test, coming in 13th out of 27 tyres tested.

Despite tests placing Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 in stronger positions overall, it is not without faults. They include average mileage and efficiency, plus slightly lacking comfort. Despite this, it still gains an edge in a range of features such as aquaplaning resistance both crosswise and longitudinally, snow handling, and exterior noise. The flexibility of this tyre offers reliable performance in various conditions, all year round.

Thus, if overall test performance and resistance to aquaplaning are prioritized, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is the preferred choice. However, if dry handling and snow traction are crucial factors for you, the Fulda MultiControl might serve you better.

In conclusion, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Fulda MultiControl both hold their own advantages in various parameters, and the choice between the two largely depends on specific user preferences and driving conditions. Test results can guide a decision, but individual requirements and experiences are essential to consider.