Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost3. Debica Navigator 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Solus HA31
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.333. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Fulda Multicontrol | 45.0 | 57.0 | |||||
| Debica Navigator 3 | 44.1 | 56.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
