Segment
2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Fulda (4%). The first tyre test of Fulda MultiControl was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the MultiControl and the Weather Control A005 EVO were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Fulda MultiControl has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO has A rating.
| # | Fulda MultiControl
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
2. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 51,1 | 56,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,5 | 58,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 52,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||