Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Fulda (64%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Kristall Control SUV and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Fulda Kristall Control SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Control SUV
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Fulda Kristall Control SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||