12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Michelin ALPIN 6 /63%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R15 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R20	R13 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

6. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

6. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

6. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

6. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

6. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

5. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

6. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

5. Barum Polaris 5 2023

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Barum Polaris 5 Good

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

6. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

6. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

69%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 79%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

6. Barum Polaris 5 46%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

6. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

4. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

6. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 75%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 73%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 59%

6. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

4. Barum Polaris 5 73%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 63%

6. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Snow traction

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 89%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

5. Barum Polaris 5 71%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

Snow braking

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 89%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

5. Barum Polaris 5 81%

6. Michelin ALPIN 6 80%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 74%

4. Barum Polaris 5 67%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

Snow handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 81%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 73%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 62%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

88%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

68%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Dry braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

6. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

5. Barum Polaris 5 71%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 70%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

82%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

5. Barum Polaris 5 69%

6. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 93%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 93%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

6. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 ?

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

6. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 91%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 83%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

6. Michelin ALPIN 6 73%

Mileage

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 98%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 82%

3. Barum Polaris 5 79%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 84%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

5. Michelin ALPIN 6 70%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

5. Barum Polaris 5 E

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 12 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36.9	28.0
Sava Eskimo HP2	37.9	28.1
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	38.6	29.6
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Michelin Alpin 6	36.2	29.7
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Michelin Alpin 6	34,1	26,4
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2-	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,0	3,2	2,4	2,5	3,7	2,5
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,0	2,2	2,4	4,0	2,5
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good	2,3	2,1	2,4	2,2	3,1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Michelin Alpin 6	34,9	29,1
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,3	25,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Michelin Alpin 6	30,4	24,7
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2	2	2+	1-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	35,5	28,1
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,5	2,4	2,9	2,5	3,3	1,5	1,6
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,4	2,5	2,3	3,6	1,5	1,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,2	2,1	2,8	3,2	2,0	2,5
Show test details

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands