Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory4. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
1. Debica Frigo HP2 100%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 12 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
12
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36.9 | 28.0 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37.9 | 28.1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 38.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 4,0 | 2,5 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 35,5 | 28,1 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
