12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R15 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Barum Polaris 5 76

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Barum Polaris 5 Good

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

69%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

4. Barum Polaris 5 46%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

4. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Barum Polaris 5 73%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 59%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Barum Polaris 5 73%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 63%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Snow braking

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

4. Barum Polaris 5 81%

Snow traction

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

Snow handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 81%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

88%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

68%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

3. Barum Polaris 5 71%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 70%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

3. Barum Polaris 5 69%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 93%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 82%

2. Barum Polaris 5 79%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 91%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 83%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 84%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

4. Barum Polaris 5 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 12 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36.9	28.0
Sava Eskimo HP2	37.9	28.1
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	38.6	29.6
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,0	3,2	2,4	2,5	3,7	2,5
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,0	2,2	2,4	4,0	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,3	25,1
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2	2	2+	1-
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	35,5	28,1
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,5	2,4	2,9	2,5	3,3	1,5	1,6
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,4	2,5	2,3	3,6	1,5	1,7
Show test details

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands