Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost3. Landsail Winter Lander Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Landsail Winter Lander vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | ||||||
| Landsail Winter Lander Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 38.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 38.0 | 38.1 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 | 35.6 | 30.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Landsail Winter Lander | 35,3 | 37,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
