18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Landsail Winter Lander

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Giti Gitiwinter W2 /59%	Landsail Winter Lander /21%

Dimensions	R15 - R19	R16 - R22	R14 - R21	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost

4. Landsail Winter Lander Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 42

4. Landsail Winter Lander 24

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13x

4. Landsail Winter Lander 3x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 7.

4. Landsail Winter Lander 23.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 28.

4. Landsail Winter Lander 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77

4. Landsail Winter Lander 29

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 2025

4. Landsail Winter Lander 2025

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Good

4. Landsail Winter Lander ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient

4. Landsail Winter Lander ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Giti
Giti
winter W2

68%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

46%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

41%

Landsail
Winter Lander

0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 12%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12%

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -57%

4. Landsail Winter Lander -57%

Wet braking

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 42%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29%

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -1%

4. Landsail Winter Lander -1%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 26%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 22%

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -39%

4. Landsail Winter Lander -39%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

4. Landsail Winter Lander ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

64%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

64.5%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

62%

Landsail
Winter Lander

0%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 35%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 35%

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -18%

4. Landsail Winter Lander -18%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 39%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 39%

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -1%

4. Landsail Winter Lander -1%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

85%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

67%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

63%

Landsail
Winter Lander

0%

Dry braking

1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -123%

2. Landsail Winter Lander -123%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 -25%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -21%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

83%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

73%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

65%

Landsail
Winter Lander

0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

4. Landsail Winter Lander ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

41.7%

Landsail
Winter Lander

0%

Mileage

1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 -118%

2. Landsail Winter Lander -118%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 -29%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -25%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

4. Landsail Winter Lander ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

0%

Landsail
Winter Lander

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1–	1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3–	2	2+	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2	2+	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	1.7
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.2
Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Sufficient	3.1
Landsail Winter Lander Rating: Poor	2.8
Show test details