• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Fulda (38%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 56% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the Kristall Control HP2 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.

# Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
/88%

Add to comparison

Fulda
Bridgestone
DimensionsR15 - R19 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test22.1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
2 2.9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Good
3.12.1
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test31,429,2
Fulda Kristall Control HP237,430,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00531,4 30,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,826,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00532,8 26,3
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test147143147
Fulda Kristall Control HP296110142
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Highly recommended
145136122
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+2+12+1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+3+2-21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Good
1-21 22+
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,61,91,52,12,71,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3,03,22,42,53,72,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
1,6 1,9 2,82,43,33,0
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,828,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00532,1 28,1
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test200674860189
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Recommended
177564557163
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Highly recommended
200 644760 177
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Good
2-2-2+ 2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Exemplary
2+ 2+1-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,324,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00530,3 24,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+12+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Exemplary
1-222
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Fulda Kristall Control HP233,524,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00529,2 24,6
Show test details