12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Debica Frigo HP2 /50%	Nokian WR Snowproof P /67%

Dimensions	R15 - R19	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R15 - R18	R17 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

5. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Barum Polaris 5 76

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

4. Debica Frigo HP2 26

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Debica Frigo HP2 9x

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 7x

Best position in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Debica Frigo HP2 7.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

5. Debica Frigo HP2 27.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 9.71

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

5. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33

Year of the last test

1. Debica Frigo HP2 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2025

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

5. Barum Polaris 5 2023

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good

3. Barum Polaris 5 Good

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

4. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

68%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

64.1%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

54%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 73%

2. Barum Polaris 5 57%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 46%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet braking

1. Barum Polaris 5 57%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 46%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 46%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 90%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

3. Barum Polaris 5 65%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Barum Polaris 5 65%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 52%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 50%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 66%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

2. Debica Frigo HP2 B

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

84.5%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

77.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

69%

Snow braking

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 83%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 81%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Snow traction

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 77%

2. Barum Polaris 5 74%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 71%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Snow cornering

1. Barum Polaris 5 71%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 67%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Snow handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 78%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 71%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

4. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

90.3%

Debica
Frigo HP2

72.6%

Barum
Polaris 5

69%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

63%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

60%

Dry braking

1. Barum Polaris 5 63%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 55%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

5. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

Dry handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 76%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 71%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

5. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

91.7%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Debica
Frigo HP2

70.9%

Barum
Polaris 5

67%

Exterior noise

1. Barum Polaris 5 72%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

5. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

3. Barum Polaris 5 ?

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

5. Debica Frigo HP2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

84.7%

Debica
Frigo HP2

81.6%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

78%

Barum
Polaris 5

77%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 65%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

5. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

5. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 84%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P 0%

5. Debica Frigo HP2 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

4. Debica Frigo HP2 C

5. Barum Polaris 5 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

0%

Debica
Frigo HP2

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	3	3
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3	3+	3	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	38.6	29.6
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2.9
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.3	3.4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	37,4	30,7
Barum Polaris 5	35,6	31,0
Debica Frigo HP2	37,0	30,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Debica Frigo HP2	37,1	26,9
Nokian WR Snowproof P	36	26,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Show test details