Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle4. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP Rating: - | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
