Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Firestone (56%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Kristall Control HP and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kristall Control HP and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Fulda Kristall Control HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Control HP
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
