Segment
2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium4. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good3. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP Rating: - | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,1 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
