Segment
2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium3. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium5. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory4. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP Rating: - | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,1 | 25 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter | 36,2 | 26,4 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
