18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Petlas Imperium PT515

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Fulda EcoControl HP2 /72%	Nokian WetProof /59%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	Petlas Imperium PT515 /42%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R14 - R20	R15 - R21	R15 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

This comparison focuses on two performance-oriented summer tyres: the
Fulda EcoControl HP2
and the
Nokian WetProof.

Fulda EcoControl HP2

The
Fulda EcoControl HP2
scores a rating of 71% in our tests. This model replaces the previous Fulda EcoControl HP model. Made by
Fulda,
this summer tyre has been particularly appreciated for its performance in aquaplaning and noise tests. Nevertheless, it does not completely balance performance, showing weaknesses in wet condition tests. Despite these, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 has been praised for its good environmental efficiency and longevity.

Nokian WetProof

The
Nokian WetProof
, manufactured in Finland by
Nokian,
obtains a slightly higher overall rating of 74%. It performs well on both dry and wet roads and is efficient, but has been criticized for its environmental impact and its longevity. This tyre also shows slight weaknesses in terms of sustainability. Its best features are its low noise and wet circle cornering.

Comparison

In the ADAC mutual test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 came 8th out of 15, while the Nokian WetProof was just behind in 11th position. On the other hand, in a comprehensive test by Autobild, the Nokian WetProof significantly outperformed the Fulda EcoControl HP2, finishing 6th out of 53, compared to the latter's 20th position.

Verdict

Overall, it seems that if you are looking for a more balanced tyre and better overall performance, the Nokian WetProof is a more competitive option than the Fulda EcoControl HP2. On the other hand, if environmental considerations and longevity are important factors for you, you might favor the Fulda EcoControl HP2 despite its slightly lower general performance.

Segment

1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle

2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 30

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

Number of tests

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Nokian WetProof 14x

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 8x

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 4.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 17.

2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 20.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WetProof 5.64

2. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

2. Nokian WetProof 2023

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 2022

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary

2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Good

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian WetProof Recommended

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 Satisfactory

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory

4. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Roadhawk

85%

Nokian
WetProof

79%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

62%

Wet braking

1. Nokian WetProof 82%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 62%

4. Fulda EcoControl HP2 61%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 91%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. Nokian WetProof 70%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Firestone Roadhawk 82%

2. Nokian WetProof 80%

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 76%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 73%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 62%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 B

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Roadhawk

86%

Nokian
WetProof

77%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

68%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

54%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WetProof 85%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 80%

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 79%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

77%

Nokian
WetProof

76%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

73%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Exterior noise

1. Nokian WetProof 80%

2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 75%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 68%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB

2. Nokian WetProof ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk ?

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Petlas
Imperium PT515

81%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

79%

Nokian
WetProof

61%

Firestone
Roadhawk

58%

Mileage

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 82%

2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 78%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

4. Nokian WetProof 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 C

2. Firestone Roadhawk C

3. Nokian WetProof C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good	2,2	2,8
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good	2,9	2,0
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good	2,7	2,8
Petlas Imperium PT515 Rating: Good	2,8	3,5
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2
Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory	2	2	3
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good	2+	2+	3
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,1	29,6
Fulda EcoControl HP2	36,0	33,8
Nokian Wetproof	35,1	31,7
Firestone Roadhawk	35,7	31,6
Petlas Imperium PT515	38,3	35,9
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,8	1,4	2,7	0,6
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,8	2,5	2,7	1,5
Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,1	2,7	3,0
Petlas Imperium PT515 Rating: Satisfactory	3,3	3,3	3,1	1,5
Show test details

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Petlas Imperium PT515

Add to comparison

Fulda EcoControl HP2

Nokian WetProof

Comparison

Verdict

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands