Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk
This comparison focuses on two performance-oriented summer tyres: the
Fulda EcoControl HP2
and the
Nokian WetProof.
Fulda EcoControl HP2
The
Fulda EcoControl HP2
scores a rating of 71% in our tests. This model replaces the previous Fulda EcoControl HP model. Made by
Fulda,
this summer tyre has been particularly appreciated for its performance in aquaplaning and noise tests. Nevertheless, it does not completely balance performance, showing weaknesses in wet condition tests. Despite these, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 has been praised for its good environmental efficiency and longevity.
Nokian WetProof
The
Nokian WetProof
, manufactured in Finland by
Nokian,
obtains a slightly higher overall rating of 74%. It performs well on both dry and wet roads and is efficient, but has been criticized for its environmental impact and its longevity. This tyre also shows slight weaknesses in terms of sustainability. Its best features are its low noise and wet circle cornering.
Comparison
In the ADAC mutual test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 came 8th out of 15, while the Nokian WetProof was just behind in 11th position. On the other hand, in a comprehensive test by Autobild, the Nokian WetProof significantly outperformed the Fulda EcoControl HP2, finishing 6th out of 53, compared to the latter's 20th position.
Verdict
Overall, it seems that if you are looking for a more balanced tyre and better overall performance, the Nokian WetProof is a more competitive option than the Fulda EcoControl HP2. On the other hand, if environmental considerations and longevity are important factors for you, you might favor the Fulda EcoControl HP2 despite its slightly lower general performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.643. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
