Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Fulda (68%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 has a better rating of 74% compared to 72% of the Fulda EcoControl HP2. The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fulda EcoControl HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 has A rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
