Segment
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Firestone Roadhawk
When comparing the Fulda EcoControl HP2 and the Dunlop Sport BluResponse, it's clear to see that there are distinct differences between these two summer tyres. They are products of Fulda and Dunlop respectively, both of which are highly respected tyre manufacturers.
The Fulda EcoControl HP2, replacing the previous Fulda EcoControl HP, scored a solid 71% on our rating scale. According to Autobild's tests, it ranked 20th out of 53 tyres and was recognized for its exterior noise and aquaplaning resistance. Fulda's tyre also proved to be environmentally friendly, with good wear and efficiency as reported by Autobild 2024. However, it did show weaknesses on wet roads.
On the other hand, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse outperformed the Fulda tyre in our rating system scoring a higher 79%. Autobild's tyre test saw Dunlop's tyre secure 11th place, owing to its rolling resistance and comfort levels. In the same test, it did well on dry roads and was described as efficient and lightweight. However, its weaknesses included a slightly unbalanced performance, minor issues on wet roads and a low mileage, adding to a less than perfect environmental footprint.
In the ADAC's tests, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse stood out for its aquaplaning resistance, dry braking and interior noise reduction, grabbing the 5th position out of 16 tyres. Yet, its disadvantages included minor weaknesses in wet braking. Comparatively, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 ended in 14th place in the same test.
In conclusion, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse seems to have a slight edge when considering overall rankings and features in various tyre tests. Although both tyres exhibit specific strengths such as the Fulda EcoControl HP2's quiet operation and the Dunlop Sport BluResponse's comfort and efficiency, the Dunlop tyre's superior rankings indicate that it may be the more reliable choice for those prioritising performance and safety. However, users with a preference for environmental soundness might find the Fulda EcoControl HP2 more suitable.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | |||||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 36,9 | 30,0 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,7 | 3,2 | 1,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,0 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 35,4 | 32,2 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
