Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
