Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Fulda (68%). The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the EcoControl HP and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 68% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||