Segment
1. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Falken Linam VAN01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Fulda (68%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Tour 2 and Falken Linam VAN01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Conveo Tour 2 and the Linam VAN01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Fulda Conveo Tour 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Falken Linam VAN01 has A rating.
| # | Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Falken Linam VAN01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
