Segment
1. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Apollo Altrust
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Tour 2 and Apollo Altrust, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Conveo Tour 2 and the Altrust were tested.
| # | Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Apollo Altrust
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
