Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Fortune FSR901 Lowcost
Comparison: Fortune FSR901 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortune) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Fortune (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the FSR901 and the PILOT ALPIN 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fortune FSR901 has E wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 has B rating.
| # | Fortune FSR901
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Fortune FSR901 | 36,3 | 25,3 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 31,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
