Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Fortuna EcoPlus 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna EcoPlus 4S vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Fortuna (0%). The first tyre test of Fortuna EcoPlus 4S was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the EcoPlus 4S and the Ecsta HS52 were tested.
| # | Fortuna EcoPlus 4S
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fortuna EcoPlus 4S | 39,1 | 34,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
