Segment
1. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S vs. Linglong Sport Master 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Linglong allround tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Fortuna (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the Sport Master 4S were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3.3 | 3 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
