Segment
2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Fortuna (0%). The first tyre test of Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the AllSeasonContact 2 were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 1.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2 | 1– | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
