12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Firestone Winterhawk 4 /56%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R22	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 101

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 20.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 10.74

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

79%

Firestone
Winterhawk 4

75

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 78%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 72%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 76%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 71%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 79%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 4

68

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 67%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 66%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 55%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 98%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4

87

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 84%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Snow handling

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

Snow cornering

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 74%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 97%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

73%

Firestone
Winterhawk 4

71

Exterior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 71%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 69%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 4 61%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 73%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4

78

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

62%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

62%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 4 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Mileage

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 55%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 56%

Price/value

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 58%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 35%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4

83

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Ice braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 13 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/60 R18

Name
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Not recommended
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Conditionally recommended
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Test winner
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Good	3	2.3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.5	2.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Not recommended	2+	3	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	2-	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Firestone Winterhawk 4	33,9	31,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,9	30,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Firestone Winterhawk 4	36	26,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,6	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2+	1-	3
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	3,2	2,2	2,1	1,7	2,8	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,1	2,4	2,8	1,9	2,9	3,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Good	6,4	6,7	8,9	8	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,4	7,6	8,2	8	7
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Very good	7,5	9,4	8,3	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2+	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Show test details

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2021 235/55 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	386	143	138	118
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Highly recommended	363	125	123	115
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	386	143	136	107
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,1	3,3	1,9	2,1	2,9	2,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Firestone Winterhawk 4	33,5	28,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Firestone Winterhawk 4	14,4	15,9	25,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	15,1	15,9	23,3
Show test details

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands