Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (59%) of the Sava Eskimo HP2 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.93
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
