Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Firestone (56%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the WR Snowproof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||