14 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Maxxis Wp 05 Arctictrekker

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Maxxis (50%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Winterhawk 3 and Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the WP-05 Arctictrekker were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R12 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker 87

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

Number of tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker 7x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker 8.

Worst position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker 36.

Average position in tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker 19.86

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker 2019

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker ?

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66.5%

Maxxis
WP-05 Arctictrekker

?

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

80.3%

Maxxis
WP-05 Arctictrekker

?

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81.4%

Maxxis
WP-05 Arctictrekker

?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75.8%

Maxxis
WP-05 Arctictrekker

?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70.3%

Maxxis
WP-05 Arctictrekker

?

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

2. Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

82.7%

Maxxis
WP-05 Arctictrekker

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker	34,2	24,6
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker	39,4	28,3
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker	40,1	-
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker	39,8	27,5
Show test details

Autozeitung

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2015 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	415	144	136	144
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	338	100	112	136
Maxxis WP-05 Arctictrekker Rating: -	310	80	104	126
Show test details