Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Matador (40%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow performance
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry performance
Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
