18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Snow traction

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 80%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow handling

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

69%

Dry braking

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 72%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Mileage

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Exterior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Show test details

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands