Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Goodride SW608
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Goodride (7%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Goodride SW608 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the SW608 were tested.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Goodride SW608
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Goodride SW608 32.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 38,2 | 27,8 | |||||
| Goodride SW608 | 37,5 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
