18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Firestone (56%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Winterhawk 3 and Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the ContiWinterContact TS 850P were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P also have C wet ratings.

#	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Premium

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 112

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

Number of tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 16x

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

Best position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 1.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 12.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

Average position in tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 3.56

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

Year of the last test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 2021

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Exemplary

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 70%

Wet braking

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 87%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 85%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 60%

Wet handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 92%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 57%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 71%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

80%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

77%

Snow traction

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 79%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 75%

Snow performance

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Snow braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 85%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 76%

Snow handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 82%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

Snow cornering

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 87%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 74%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

78%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

77%

Dry performance

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 81%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Dry braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 75%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 70%

Dry driving behavior

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Dry handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 86%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

79%

Mileage

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 85%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 75%

Fuel efficiency

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 85%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 88%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 79%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

71%

Exterior noise

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 80%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

Interior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 68%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Comfort

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 79%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72 dB

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

82%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

0%

Ice braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 81%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	30,3
Firestone Winterhawk 3	37,9
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P	31,8	25,2
Show test details

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands