Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 31,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
