Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Viking Protech NewGen
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Roadhawk
| Viking Protech NewGen
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you're deciding between the Firestone Roadhawk and the Viking Protech NewGen, there are numerous factors you should consider. The two tyres have participated in several tests, but how do they stack up against each other?
The primary strength of the Firestone Roadhawk lies in its impressive dry handling. In the Autobild test, it scores well for dry road performance, wet road handling, and wet side guidance. High efficiency and low wear were also highlighted across the board and they scored well in these areas in the 2023 Autobild test. However, the tyre seems to have some weaknesses on wet roads, as indicated in the 2023 and 2021 Autobild tests. The tire's longevity was another concern.
On the other hand, the Viking Protech NewGen earned the highest mark for fuel efficiency in the 2021 ADAC test. According to the 2023 Autobild review, the tyre's environmental footprint is commendable, and it offers adequate mileage. However, it did not perform well on dry and wet roads. In the ADAC 2021 test, it showed weakness in dry and wet road performance, which led to a downgrade in the rating.
In terms of ranking, the Firestone Roadhawk has proven to perform slightly better overall. It secured the 10th position in a test involving 53 tyres according to Autobild, while its performance in the ADAC puts it at the 17th spot. The Viking Protech NewGen trailed behind it, coming 16th and 36th in the ADAC and Autobild tests respectively.
In conclusion, the Firestone Roadhawk is a viable option in terms of dry road handling and fuel economy, but may not be the best choice for wet road conditions. The Viking Protech NewGen's biggest strength is its fuel efficiency. However, its overall performance on both dry and wet roads is less commendable. Therefore, the choice between these two tyres would highly depend on your specific driving conditions and needs.
Neither the Firestone Roadhawk nor the Viking Protech NewGen have been replaced by newer models, meaning their manufacturers likely still have confidence in their performance. However, it's always important to determine whether a tyre suits your individual driving habits and conditions before making a final purchasing decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Viking Protech NewGen 32.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
| Viking ProTech NewGen | 70.4 | 31.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen | 39,8 | 33,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Viking ProTech NewGen | 38,1 | 36,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
