• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
Autoklub ČR Autoklub ČR
Summer
2023 205/55 R16 View

Comparing the Firestone Roadhawk and the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, the latter emerges as the superior model according to various tyre tests results. Let's delve deeper into the specifics of each tyre to provide a fair comparison.


The Firestone Roadhawk, according to our ratings, received 72% score. In the Autobild test amongst 51 tyres, it came in at 30th place, while it secured 11th and 20th positions in Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests respectively. The Roadhawk received praise for being efficient and lightweight with low wear. Its strength lies in its performance on dry roads. However, it's not without its weaknesses, with the main issues being inadequate performance on wet surfaces and lower mileage.


On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a strong follow-up to the previous model Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, surpasses Roadhawk in terms of our rating, achieving an impressive 85%. It outperformed Roadhawk in all mutual tests. According to Autobild, it secured the 2nd position out of 51 tyres, showcasing excellence in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking. In both Autoklub ČR and ADAC, the Ventus Prime 4 ranked higher than the Roadhawk, claiming 9th place in each. Its key strengths include balanced performance on both dry and wet roads. Minimal weaknesses were found, with slight issues in aquaplaning and efficiency.


From the comparison, it's evident that the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk overall. Regardless of the strengths of Firestone Roadhawk, the Ventus Prime 4 offers stronger all-round performance, making it a clear choice for those seeking reliable summer tyres.


For updated information on these models or to explore new tyre offerings from these manufacturers, please visit the Firestone and Hankook pages on our website.


In conclusion, both the Firestone Roadhawk and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 offer credible performances, but the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stands out as a better performer in tyre tests overall. It's, therefore, an excellent choice considering the balance of its strengths and weaknesses.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
54%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Best: Vredestein Ultrac (98.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Best: Vredestein Ultrac (96.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Best: Vredestein Ultrac (100.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein Ultrac (92.6%)
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
87%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
89%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (96.0%)
Dry Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance (94.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (100.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison