• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3

Today, we're analysing two summer tyres from well-known manufacturers: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Continental PremiumContact 6. Both tyres have been subjected to a variety of tests to determine their performance and functionality under different conditions.

The Firestone Roadhawk, produced by Firestone, secured a decent 72% rating from our team. In the ADAC test, it was in the 17th position, while in the autobild test it achieved the 13th rank out of 53. These rankings suggest that the tyre performs reasonably well, but still has room for improvement. Special mention should be given to its dry handling and wet-handling capabilities, which were highlighted as its best features.


In spite of these strengths, test summaries suggested that the Firestone Roadhawk had some weaknesses on wet surfaces, raising concerns over its ability to maintain control in such conditions. Furthermore, longer durability was also mentioned as an aspect needing improvement. On the upside, the tyre received commendation for low fuel consumption and efficient load handling.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6, brought to market by Continental, enjoyed a higher rating of 87% from our team. This tyre has since been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


In comparison with the Firestone Roadhawk, the Continental PremiumContact 6 fared better in tests, securing the 2nd position in the ADAC test, and 8th in autobild. It notably outshines its competitor in terms of wet braking, a feature that is crucial for maintaining control during unexpected rainfall. It also excelled in both dry handling and mileage.


In the autozeitung test, it even secured the 1st position. The plus points noted in its test summary include high driving safety, good performance on both dry and wet surfaces, and low fuel consumption. The tyre was also praised for having no significant weaknesses.


In conclusion, while the Firestone Roadhawk is a solid option, our recommendation would lean towards the Continental PremiumContact 6 for its brilliant all-round performance, superb wet handling, and durability. This being said, it's always important to consider individual driving habits and requirements before making a final choice.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Bridgestone Turanza T005
75%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
96%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
51%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
84%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (92.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
57%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
51%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
69%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
78%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (96.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (92.8%)
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Semperit Speed-Life 3
62%
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
57%
Dry Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
67%
Best in category: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 (93.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Bridgestone Turanza T005
64%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
72%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (90.0%)
Ride Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
56%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
56%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4 (81.5%)
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
55%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
62%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Semperit Speed-Life 3
66%
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
63%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
46%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
61%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
69%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
69%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (94.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison