In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Firestone (0%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Multiseason and Nokian WeatherProof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Firestone Multiseason was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WeatherProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Multiseason and the WeatherProof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
All season
|
2018 | 175/65 R14 | View |
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Firestone Multiseason
Nokian WeatherProof
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.