Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason Upper-middle2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Multiseason vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken allround tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Firestone (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Multiseason and the EuroALL Season AS210 were tested.
| # | Firestone Multiseason
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory2. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason | 47,1 | 55,9 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 43,6 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
