Segment
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Firestone (70%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Multihawk 2 and Fulda EcoControl HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Firestone Multihawk 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Multihawk 2 and the EcoControl HP were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Multihawk 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B rating.
# | Firestone Multihawk 2
| Fulda EcoControl HP
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
Firestone Multihawk 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,4 | |
Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,2 | 2,4 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,1 | |
Show test details |