Segment
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Multihawk 2 and Fulda EcoControl HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Firestone Multihawk 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Fulda EcoControl HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Multihawk 2 and the EcoControl HP were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Multihawk 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B rating.
| # | Firestone Multihawk 2
| Fulda EcoControl HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Firestone Multihawk 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 2,4 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
